TA-14TA-14 EXCHANGEAI Governance Playground
TA-14AI Governance StandardsGovernance Library

STANDARDS LIBRARY

Turn published standards into governed execution routes.

Explore AI governance, risk, management-system, oversight, and technical standards without collapsing guidance, requirements, legal obligations, certification claims, and implementation evidence into one unsupported declaration.

Explore Standards→Build From a Standard

TA-14 STANDARD BOUNDARY

A standard is not automatically a law, certification, or execution control.

The library preserves what a standard says, who issued it, which edition is being interpreted, whether a clause is mandatory or advisory within its own structure, and what evidence is needed before a related governance claim can support execution.

INITIAL STANDARDS CATALOG

Begin with the standards most directly connected to organizational AI governance.

Each module is designed to preserve source identity, version, interpretation boundaries, applicability, evidence expectations, crosswalks, and direct transition into TA-14 route construction.

01Priority module

AI management system standard

ISO/IEC 42001

Explore organizational governance, policy, objectives, risk treatment, operational controls, monitoring, internal review, corrective action, and continual improvement for an AI management system.

Open standard module→
02Priority module

AI risk management guidance

ISO/IEC 23894

Review risk identification, analysis, evaluation, treatment, communication, monitoring, and lifecycle considerations for AI systems and organizational decision-making.

Open standard module→
03Priority module

Governance implications of organizational AI use

ISO/IEC 38507

Examine the responsibilities of governing bodies, organizational oversight, accountability, strategic alignment, and the governance implications of deploying and using AI.

Open standard module→
04Catalog module

Technical and ethical standards ecosystem

IEEE AI Standards

Navigate relevant IEEE work involving transparency, bias, explainability, safety, accountability, system design, and responsible technology development.

Open standard module→

SOURCE AUTHORITY RECORD

Preserve the standard before interpreting the standard.

Every standards module should make the source, edition, authority, scope, interpretation status, and review history visible before a clause is mapped to evidence or execution.

Issuing organizationOfficial titleStandard numberEdition and versionPublication dateAmendments and correctionsLegal or contractual forceScope and exclusionsApplicable rolesRequirement or guidance statusSource locatorInterpretation boundaryCrosswalk relationshipsReview history

FROM STANDARD TO ROUTE

Follow a controlled governance sequence.

01Read the standard context
02Identify applicable clauses
03Preserve source authority
04Map evidence expectations
05Crosswalk related obligations
06Build a TA-14 route
07Test governance conditions
08Preserve and verify the result

CROSSWALK WITHOUT COLLAPSE

Related requirements are not always equivalent requirements.

TA-14 crosswalks preserve whether a relationship is equivalent, partial, related, conflicting, unmapped, or still unreviewed. A similarity in language does not prove that the same evidence, authority, timing, or execution condition satisfies both sources.

Open Crosswalk Engine

BOUNDARY

TA-14 does not reproduce or replace controlled standards text.

Library summaries, mappings, and implementation routes should point users back to the authoritative source and preserve the limits of the interpretation. Access to a standards module does not create accreditation, certification, legal compliance, or proof that an implementation conforms to the official standard.

BUILD FROM THE SOURCE

Select a standard. Bind the evidence. Govern the route.

Move from published governance expectations into explicit applicability, evidence, authority, decision, commitment, execution, and outcome conditions.

Build a Governance Route→