PERMANENT INSTITUTIONAL BIOGRAPHY
TA-14-AIGR-000035
One governance identity. Every preserved state beneath it. Versions, demonstrations, examinations, artifacts, findings, challenges, corrections, responses and independent publications accumulate here without rewriting what came before.
History accumulates. It does not disappear.
A later version does not silently inherit an earlier finding. A participant response does not become TA-14's voice. A correction does not erase the original record. Each event remains attributable to its own source, evidence state, version and governed boundary.
CHRONOLOGICAL RECORD
What happened, in order.
Governance identity entered the TA-14 public Registry
The TA-14 Building Admissibility Gate (BAG) is a pre-execution governance architecture for determining whether building information, work orders, observations, models, digital twins, AI proposals, control requests, and human actions possess sufficient current standing to cross from information into consequential physical execution. BAG governs the transition through a defined chain: Building Reality → Building Record → Spatial/Object Continuity → Evidence Admissibility → Authority → Binding → Commit → Physical Execution → Outcome/New Reality. The architecture applies twelve building-specific admissibility gates covering facility identity, spatial identity, asset identity, requested consequence, physical-condition evidence, evidence continuity, authority standing, route containment, changed conditions, commit control, outcome evidence, and closure/reset. BAG preserves key distinctions that building systems often collapse, including: Capability is not authority. Identity is not standing. A work order is not proof of physical condition. A model or digital twin is not direct physical observation. Authentication is not execution authority. Command acceptance is not proof of physical outcome. Historical ALLOW is not current permission after material change. Runtime determinations are exactly: ALLOW HOLD DENY ESCALATE ALLOW represents bounded current execution standing and is treated as a temporary execution lease rather than permanent permission. Immediately before consequential commit, the evaluated target, evidence, authority, route, consequence, policy/chain state, and material conditions must still match the state that produced ALLOW. The architecture also defines proposition-bound evidence, evidence freshness and revocation, compare-and-bind commit control, refusal preservation, concurrent consequence conflict handling, retry/replay governance, degraded and emergency modes, interoperability bridge boundaries, outcome evidence, and new-reality chain reset. The governing rule is: No admissible evidence. No admissible execution. This registration describes a bounded TA-14 development architecture and reference implementation. It does not claim certification, code compliance, life-safety approval, professional licensure, external adoption, production readiness, universal interoperability, guaranteed safe physical outcomes, or successful physical execution in any named building.
Open governed record →VOICE & RECORD SEPARATION
The chronology can contain disagreement without collapsing identity.
Each record remains attributable. Presence in this history means the event is part of the preserved institutional chronology; it does not mean TA-14 adopted another party's statement, endorsed the architecture, or changed an earlier finding.