These preserved runs show the difference between correcting a bounded lexical mismatch and silently inventing semantic equivalence. Google may discover candidates using its own interpretation. TA-14 independently determines whether the preserved evidence has sufficient standing to cross the delivery boundary.
ASG-MTRPEORA·asg.v0.4·PRESERVED FAILURE
marshmellows
8 established · 0 ALLOW · 8 DENY · 0 delivered
Literal token equality rejected the provider-established marshmallow subject because the bounded request contained a one-character spelling error.
Architectural consequence: Established the need for governed lexical normalization without rewriting the original request.
ASG-MTRPI8AR·asg.v0.5·PRESERVED FALSE DENY
marshmallows
7 established · 6 ALLOW · 1 DENY · 6 delivered
The singular Wikipedia candidate ‘Marshmallow’ was rejected against the plural request ‘marshmallows.’
Architectural consequence: Established the need for bounded singular/plural continuity.
ASG-MTRPVZ9U·asg.v0.6·PRESERVED BOUNDARY TEST
sumbitch
9 established · 8 ALLOW · 1 DENY · 8 delivered
The candidate ‘SOM BITCH’ remained outside lexical standing because admitting it would require a phonetic/colloquial transformation across token boundaries.
Architectural consequence: Demonstrates where bounded normalization deliberately stops interpreting.
ASG-MTRPZ6TK·asg.v0.6·PROVIDER-INFERENCE REJECTION
.khvlugckjtdxjkhv b/lm n /lkhblvu ky fijyfxcikulhbj 'kn';ulgc itrxi
7 established · 0 ALLOW · 7 DENY · 0 delivered
The provider inferred University of Louisville Golf Club candidates from an otherwise unbound request. TA-14 preserved all seven candidates but did not inherit the provider’s inferred meaning as delivery standing.
Architectural consequence: Demonstrates provider interpretation is candidate evidence, not delivery authority.