Article 50(1)TA-14-A50-01
Direct interaction with an AI system
Natural persons interact directly with an AI system unless the interaction is obvious from the circumstances and context of use.
Map the actor, content, obligation, evidence, and disclosure route.
This front-end workspace helps separate applicability from implementation and evidence. It does not make a legal determination. It creates a bounded assessment record showing which Article 50 pathways were considered, what evidence was declared, what remains missing, and where independent review is required.
ASSESSMENT BUILDER
Declare the context before selecting the obligation.
What role is being assessed?
What does the system generate, manipulate, or present?
Select pathways requiring assessment
Only pathways matching the declared role and content are displayed.
Article 50(3)TA-14-A50-03
Emotion recognition and biometric categorisation notice
Natural persons are exposed to an emotion-recognition or biometric-categorisation system and an applicable exception has not been established.
Which evidence items are presently available?
Selecting an item only records a declaration in this browser state. It does not validate, upload, inspect, or authenticate the evidence.
SELECTED PATHWAY DETAILS
What must be tested, and what must not be overstated?
Article 50(1)TA-14-A50-01
Direct interaction with an AI system
Implementation questions
- Does the user interact directly with the AI system?
- Would a reasonable person understand from context that the system is AI?
- When is the disclosure first presented?
- Can the disclosure be distinguished from ordinary interface content?
- Does the disclosure remain present after material interface changes?
Claims this record cannot support by itself
- A chatbot label alone does not prove sufficient disclosure.
- A policy document does not prove the disclosure appeared to users.
- A design mock-up does not prove production deployment.
GOVERNED OUTPUT PACKAGE
A complete route should produce separate records.
Applicability Record
Actor, system, content type, deployment context, obligation considered, exception considered, and unresolved interpretation.
Evidence Map
Each claimed measure bound to evidence identity, owner, version, date, location, and validation state.
Implementation Record
The actual marking, notice, disclosure, interface, workflow, or publication mechanism used.
Testing Record
Detectability, persistence, placement, timing, robustness, failure states, and technical limitations.
Independent Review Record
Reviewer, scope, evidence inspected, objections, corrections, findings, and limitations.
Change and Outcome Record
What changed, what was approved, held, denied, escalated, superseded, or left unresolved.
An Article 50 checklist is not an admissible transparency record.
The assessment must preserve who made the claim, what role they occupied, what content was involved, which obligation was considered, what evidence existed, what remained missing, who reviewed the route, and what conclusion the evidence could actually support.