MACHINE CANNOT SELF-AUTHORIZE
WeRAI / G=1 is publicly described by Steven Stobo as preserving a named human at the irreversible execution boundary.
PUBLIC INTEROPERABILITY PARTICIPANT RECORD
Steven Stobo has publicly accepted TA-14's invitation to examine a bounded interoperability seam between WeRAI / Human Router / G=1 and the TA-14 Admissible Human Intervention Architecture (AHIA). The purpose is not to merge the architectures. It is to test whether each can preserve its own authority boundary while contributing evidence to one consequential route.
THE PROPOSED SEAM
The public proposition is narrow: WeRAI / G=1 preserves the non-delegable human committal at an irreversible boundary; TA-14 AHIA independently examines whether that human intervention is admissible before consequence. A determination by one side does not manufacture authority for the other.
WeRAI / G=1 is publicly described by Steven Stobo as preserving a named human at the irreversible execution boundary.
TA-14 AHIA independently asks whether the human intervention has sufficient evidence, authority, scope, standing, independence and present conditions.
Neither architecture may treat the other architecture's determination as authority it did not independently establish.
A HOLD, DENY, limitation, mismatch or failed interoperability condition remains an admissible outcome of the examination.
EXAMINATION CANDIDATE
DISCLOSURE BOUNDARY
This page records only the public interoperability intent already stated by the participants. It does not publish source code, private governance artifacts, technical implementation details, confidential evidence, proprietary architecture internals, or an examination finding. No TA-14 Registry identifier has been assigned to WeRAI / Human Router on this page. Registration remains pending.