01Available
EU AI Act
European Union
Explore risk classifications, prohibited practices, provider and deployer duties, transparency requirements, governance obligations, conformity pathways, and evidence expectations.
Open EU AI Act→LAWS & REGULATIONS
Know what is binding before claiming what is compliant.
Explore AI governance laws by jurisdiction, regulated role, system type, risk condition, sector, effective date, and legal force. Each module should preserve the official source, version, applicability boundary, evidence expectations, unresolved questions, and review history.
LEGAL-FORCE BOUNDARY
Not every governance source carries the same authority.
The library keeps enacted law, regulation, official guidance, regulator interpretation, policy, standard, framework, and internal control separate. A useful mapping never converts a voluntary source into a legal obligation or treats a summary as the official text.
JURISDICTION MODULES
Enter through the authority that governs the route.
Each jurisdiction module should show who is regulated, what is regulated, when duties apply, how obligations change by role, and what evidence supports a bounded determination.
02Available
Federal and state governance
United States
Track executive, agency, sector, procurement, civil-rights, consumer-protection, and state-level AI governance sources without collapsing them into one national rule.
Explore United States→03Available
Federal and provincial governance
Canada
Review Canadian legislation, policy instruments, privacy obligations, automated-decision requirements, and evolving AI accountability structures.
Explore Canada→04Available
Principles-led regulatory approach
United Kingdom
Examine regulator-led AI governance, sector obligations, safety expectations, assurance activity, and the relationship between guidance and enforceable duties.
Explore United Kingdom→05Available
Global legal map
Other Jurisdictions
Navigate country and regional AI laws while preserving jurisdiction, effective date, legal force, regulated role, sector, and version boundaries.
Open global map→APPLICABILITY QUESTIONS
Legal review begins with the right questions.
A jurisdiction name alone is not enough. Applicability depends on the actor, system, activity, geography, sector, timing, and legal condition attached to the route.
01What jurisdiction governs the activity?
02What role does the organization occupy?
03What AI system or use is regulated?
04What duties are binding, conditional, or prohibited?
05What evidence demonstrates support for each duty?
06What remains unresolved or requires legal review?
TA-14 LEGAL IMPLEMENTATION METHOD
From official text to a governed execution route.
Source
Preserve the official instrument, issuing body, version, language, publication date, and effective date.
Applicability
Determine jurisdiction, regulated role, system scope, exclusions, thresholds, and unresolved conditions.
Requirement
Separate each obligation, prohibition, exception, timing condition, and required actor.
Evidence
Identify what records, authority, continuity, controls, and outcomes would support the requirement.
Route
Compile the requirement into TA-14 bindings, commitments, execution boundaries, and decisions.
Verification
Preserve the result so another reviewer can inspect, challenge, replay, or correct it.
FIRST REGULATION MODULE
Open the EU AI Act governance workspace.
Review requirements, map relevant TA-14 governance layers, preserve supporting evidence, and keep unsupported compliance claims from becoming execution permission.