EU AI ACT RECORD WORKSPACE
Know which records must exist before anyone claims compliance.
Build the record architecture supporting each applicable EU AI Act obligation. Preserve what every record proves, what it does not prove, who owns it, which version applies, and where evidence remains incomplete.
IMPORTANT BOUNDARY
A record can support a compliance claim without proving the claim is legally correct.
Governed Records preserve evidence, versions, ownership, authority, continuity, and declared limitations. Legal applicability, conformity assessment, certification, and regulatory conclusions remain separate determinations.
RECORD REQUIREMENT LIBRARY
Every obligation needs a record that can be inspected later.
Search by article, record type, evidence field, proof boundary, or governance purpose.
- Which risks were identified
- Which evidence supported each determination
- Which mitigations were selected
- Who held review authority
- Whether outcomes were later verified
- That every risk was identified
- That a mitigation was legally sufficient
- That the system is safe in every operating context
RECORD ARCHITECTURE
Requirement → Record → Continuity → Review → Determination
The requirement should never be connected directly to a compliance claim. A governed record must preserve the evidence and boundary between them.
Declare the obligation
Identify the article, role, system, use case, and applicability rationale.
Create the record
Preserve evidence, ownership, scope, dates, versions, and limitations.
Review continuity
Confirm that the record remains connected across source, time, custody, and change.
Preserve the determination
Record who concluded what, from which evidence, under which authority.
CREATE THE SUPPORTING RECORD
Start with the evidence before making the compliance claim.
Build the governed record, preserve its proof boundaries, and then route it into continuity review, entity review, or execution readiness.